[oss-gost-crypto] Fwd: Re: Should we consider removing Streebog from the Linux Kernel?

[Wartan Hachaturow]

Совершенно непонятно в таком случае, почему открытый алгоритм от NIST быть
должен, а открытый алгоритм от другого standard body - не должен. Или все,
или никаких и один cha-cha c blowfish.

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, 14:32 Vitaly Chikunov <vt at altlinux.org> wrote:

> Очередной наброс.
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83 at protonmail.ch>
> -----
>
> Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 10:51:11 +0000
> From: Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83 at protonmail.ch>
> To: Vitaly Chikunov <vt at altlinux.org>
> Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers at kernel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso at mit.edu>,
> "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason at zx2c4.com>,
>         "herbert at gondor.apana.org.au" <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au>, "
> linux-crypto at vger.kernel.org"
>         <linux-crypto at vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: Should we consider removing Streebog from the Linux Kernel?
>
> On Monday, April 1, 2019 10:04 AM, Vitaly Chikunov <vt at altlinux.org>
> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Can you elaborate on why you want to use Streebog? When we added
> Speck, we
> > > explained in great detail why it was useful from a technical
> perspective (before
> > > Adiantum was ready). I don't see any such explanation for Streebog.
> >
> > Our users demand that file integrity is implemented using their national
> > standard algorithm.
> >
> > Thanks,
>
> Does it mean that every state can demand from Linux kernel to carrying
> crypto
> algorithms of their choice?
>
> Jordan
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> _______________________________________________
> oss-gost-crypto mailing list
> oss-gost-crypto at lists.altlinux.org
> https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/oss-gost-crypto
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/oss-gost-crypto/attachments/20190402/06b4878a/attachment.html>