[devel] Q: --no-copy-dt-needed-entries

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 08:24:32PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> 2010/3/24 Dmitry V. Levin <ldv на altlinux.org>:
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 06:34:43PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 05:51:13PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> > [...]
> >> > So, contrary to the initial message, with --as-needed on, there seems
> >> > to be NO REASON to enable --no-copy-dt-needed-entries by default.
> >>
> >> Just the opposite, there is a reason to link ELF executables with all
> >> libraries they use directly.  Applications should be neither overlinked
> >> nor underlinked.  The first problem is solved by --as-needed, the second
> >> issue will be fixed by enabling --no-copy-dt-needed-entries by default.
> >
> > I was wrong, --copy-dt-needed-entries does not produce underlinked apps,
> > so I withdraw my proposal to change the default from --copy-dt-needed-entries
> > to --no-copy-dt-needed-entries.
> 
> Dmitry, what do you think about gold? What will we do if Fedora
> switches to gold. If we want to switch to gold too, we have to prepare
> for it. --no-copy-dt-needed-entries is one of step of the preparing.

I haven't tried gold yet.  If it doesn't implement
--copy-dt-needed-entries, we could request this feature or just implement
it ourselves.


-- 
ldv
----------- ????????? ????? -----------
???? ??????? ???????? ?? ? ????????? ???????...
???     : ???????????
???     : application/pgp-signature
??????  : 198 ??????
????????: ???????????
Url     : <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100324/d66e70eb/attachment.bin>