[Comm-en] ALT for scientist

Aleksey Smirnov smi at altlinux.ru
Wed Feb 19 22:58:05 MSK 2003


vadim at mail.cytspb.rssi.ru wrote:

>>>How about ALT LJ2.4 Science&Engineering edition :) ?
>>>      
>>>
>>3.0 it will be :)
>>We will need at least:
>>1. A head for such a project
>>2. Contributors to deal with
>>... and the most important thing - user's interest in it. 
>>    
>>
>
>No product->No interest->No product->.... :(
>
>  
>
>>If you can provide us any statistics concerning user's interest in such a
>>project - why not?
>>    
>>
>
>Well, IMHO until MS does not start any raids in the scientific institutes - there will be no 
>BIG interest. Just some people like me.
>
Perhaps, the reason is, the most of scientific software is prepared in 
Universities, and is usually developped for Unix.

>
>In all cases, what is needed - a distro that *easily replaces* MS programs most often 
>used. Junior is not such a distro. It's sad, but it is (of couse, "replaces", but not "easily"). 
>
>MS presses the computer stores no to sell pirated windows, and if you can roll out 
>something like Lindows - one mail client, one office suite, maybe Kylix (activation key user 
>should obtain in Borland) - you will sell it better than hot dogs  near the high school at 
>noon. IMHO. My friends from computer company said they would seriously consider Linux 
>distho that complies to these requirements. And does not have any significant glitches. 
>And uses MS fonts w/o any extra overhead (the MS license allows the distribution of 
>Verdana, Times New Roman, Arial, and Courier New).
>
Please, give me the link to such a license.

>
>Well,surely, after installation such a distro should allow the "root" to completely remove 
>itself. It's sad, but true.  95% of folks, I afraid, will use that tool to remove ALT and install 
>
It is not enough :-)
I'd advise to use fdisk befor.

>the pirated Windows, but the rest will be yours - and may form a growth point. 
>
>BTW - is it too hard to cooperate with some company thad writes financial software to 
>make  "Parus for Linux" or "Comtech for Linux"?  Goddamit, but Russ. Acad. Sci. requires 
>that RAS institutes use Parus for DOS!!! I was mad when our "glavbuch" told they are 
>moving (in Dec. 2002) their data from 1C for Windows to that crazy Parus for DOS...
>
Yes, it is really very hard. We really do owr best, just have a look at 
the list of non-free software in the ALT Linux Master 2.2 description on 
our site.

I have read your article at nomicrosoft.ru. If you have looked into the 
manual before configuring, you should not try to look for russian 
localisation under root.

Aleksey




More information about the community-en mailing list