05.04.2011 21:53, Josh Boyer wrote: > Do you know of a valid reason the /dev/hvc0 would be excluded, or is > this simple a case of someone not reporting the issue as of yet. I > would appreciate any thoughts you have. Please CC me on reply. Nobody has reported this issue yet. Will be enough to add /dev/hvc[0-9]* to the list? -- Rgrds, legion