[Gnome] разъяснения о Gnome-shell

Anatoly Chernov aichernov на umail.ru
Вт Авг 9 15:53:48 UTC 2011


09.08.2011 10:21, Ildar Mulyukov пишет:
> Предлагаю вашему вниманию пару статей --- попытку ответить на довольно
> частый вопрос: почему всё именно так в Gnome3?
> ...

Очень всё грустно. Вся надежда на  Гнома 2 из бранчей (на его хоть
какую-то поддержку).
Гнома 3 даже Торвальдс вроде не осилил (цитата из какого-то треда):

> Why can't I have shortcuts on my desktop? Why can't I have the expose functionality?
> Wobbly windows? Why does anybody sane think that it's a good idea to have that
> "go to the crazy 'activities'" menu mode?
>
> I used to be upset when gnome developers decided it was "too complicated" for the user
> to remap some mouse buttons. In gnome3, the developers have apparently decided that it's
> "too complicated" to actually do real work on your desktop, and have decided to make it
> really annoying to do.
>
> Here's an example of "the crazy": you want a new terminal window.
> So you go to "activities" and press the "terminal" thing that you've made part of your
> normal desktop thing (but why can't I just have it on the desktop, instead of in that
> insane "activities" mode?). What happens? Nothing.
> It brings your existing terminal to the forefront.
>
> That's just crazy crap. Now I need to use Shift-Control-N in an old terminal
> to bring up a new one. Yeah, that's a real user experience improvement. Sure.
>
> I'm sure there are other ways, but that's just an example of the kind of
> "head up the arse" behavior of gnome3. Seriously. I have been asking other
> developers about gnome3, they all think it's crazy.
>
> I'm using Xfce.
> I think it's a step down from gnome2, but it's a huge step up from gnome3. Really.

Ссылка на тред есть на ЛОРЕ.
Regards. ;)

-- 
Anatoly Chernov aichernov на umail.ru


Подробная информация о списке рассылки Gnome