[devel] packages/girar-builder: heads/master

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:25:13PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:11:29PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 08:04:53PM +0300, Alexey M. Tourbin wrote:
> > > Update of /people/at/packages/girar-builder.git
> > > 
> > > Changes statistics since `0.1-37-gd5591b2' follows:
> > >  gb-task-check-lastchange |   10 ++++++++++
> > >  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Changelog since `0.1-37-gd5591b2' follows:
> > > commit 199ac69c43909442a857a2e23b93d9fce4617a42
> > > Author: Alexey Tourbin <at на altlinux>
> > > Date:   Wed Mar 17 20:04:06 2010 +0300
> > > 
> > >     gb-task-check-lastchange: handle kernel-image-* and kernel-modules-* specially
> > 
> > There are no need to add these exceptions yet.  Instead, I suggest to
> > apply this check only for those packages that are not tested for git
> > inheritance, i.e. only for packages built/copied from srpms.
> 
> And why testing gear-based src.rpm packages could be possibly wrong?
> Is there a good reason for removing last changelog entry from specfile?

I have no idea what do you name as "good" reasons, but certainly there are
reasons to push changes violating your gb-task-check-lastchange.  For
example, the cdrkit release mentioned earlier.  Of course there is a known
way to bypass all these inheritance checks by renaming source packages,
but it makes our repository uglier.


-- 
ldv
----------- следующая часть -----------
Было удалено вложение не в текстовом формате...
Имя     : отсутствует
Тип     : application/pgp-signature
Размер  : 198 байтов
Описание: отсутствует
Url     : <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100317/01a13018/attachment.bin>