[devel] Fwd: Re: CONFIG_DEVTMPFS

[Anton Farygin]

Только это становится не нужным с DEVTMPFS


17.12.2009 11:42, Michael Shigorin пишет:
> 	Здравствуйте.
> А ведь поляки правы -- базовые статические записи в /dev
> можно засунуть и в udev, если он становится обязательным
> в системе.
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Patryk Zawadzki<patrys/pld-linux.org>  -----
>
> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:40:32 +0100
> From: Patryk Zawadzki<patrys/pld-linux.org>
> To: shigorin/gmail.com,
> 	"PLD: Developers list (English)"<pld-devel-en/lists.pld-linux.org>
> Subject: Re: CONFIG_DEVTMPFS
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Michael Shigorin<mike/osdn.org.ua>  wrote:
>> JFYI, I've done dev-minimal package in ALT Linux
>> hoping to use it for this very reason: some bare /dev
>> in case modern stuff fails again.
>>
>> Unfortunately didn't get around to integrating it to distros
>> (hmm... maybe today is the day? ;-), only installed by hand
>> on a few systems.
>
> We have udev package providing the minimum required to launch shells
> (/dev/zero, /dev/console etc.). It's all nice but still requires
> initramfs to create its own device nodes. In case of DEVTMPFS you
> don't have to do anything at boot time, just chmod the nodes after
> switch_root (or let udev rules do it) :)
>