[d-kernel] kernel-modules-lm_sensors-aw-up-2.8.0-alt11: rebuild
QA Team Robot
qa at altlinux.org
Wed Dec 24 16:52:25 MSK 2003
() \ Hey it's QA song time!
_/______\_ Have yourself a merry little Christmas,
(__________) Let your heart be light,
(/ @ @ \) ...
(`._,()._,') Hang a shining star on the highest bough,
( `-'`-' ) And have yourself a merry little Christmas now.
Packager: Kernel Maintainer Team <kernel at packages.altlinux>
9 time(s) (last time: Wed Sep 03 2003) by Ed V. Bartosh <ed at altlinux>
4 time(s) (last time: Mon Sep 01 2003) by Zhenja Kaluta <tren at altlinux>
Status: rebuild failed; please fix.
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
E: Version ='2.8.0' for 'kernel-source-lm_sensors' was not found
Selected version 4.0.4-alt28 (Sisyphus:unstable/Unknown) for rpm
rpm is already the newest version.
Selected version 1:2.4.21-alt23 (Sisyphus:unstable/Unknown) for kernel-headers-aw-up
install: failed to calculate package file list.
5.81user 4.71system 0:14.15elapsed 74%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (59693major+35882minor)pagefaults 0swaps
[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition
of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this
belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. We're dealing with
beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. There's nothing there....
It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. It's got technical
terms. It's got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite
glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from
metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The
fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that
should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They
have not proved their case....It's just simply gibberish. The fact is, there's
no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. It's been tested
and tested over the centuries. Nobody's ever found any validity to it at
all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it
has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable --
you test it. And in that astrology is reqlly quite something else.
-- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC
News "Nightline," May 3, 1988
More information about the devel-kernel